"Policies like this enable domestic violence perpetrators"
He told the Assembly that family-court privacy "enabled domestic violence perpetrators to psychologically torture their exes." In 2008 a court extended a protection order against him.
On camera
"It is policies like these that were in effect when divorce lawyers abused their own clients. It is policies like this that enabled domestic violence perpetrators to psychologically torture their exes, who had no choice but to suffer in silence."
"SB432: Family Court Privacy, May 23, 2025," his testimony to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary, published by Our Nevada Judges, at 15:29
In the file
form finding: "an act of domestic violence has occurred and/or you represent a credible threat"
Extended Order for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Second Judicial District Court, Family Division, No. FV08-03338, October 10, 2008 (NSC No. 65289, Record on Appeal Vol. II, pp. 60-61)
"he admitted that he had put his hands on her on one occasion."
Falconi v. Secretary of State, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 28 (April 25, 2013), slip op. p. 3
"never committed any acts of domestic violence"
His Opening Brief, No. CV09-03089 (NSC No. 56169, Record on Appeal Vol. 2, p. 67)
Context. He testified against a family-court privacy bill in the name of the victims of domestic violence. The record of his own case is on this page: the 2008 extended protection order against him, his testimony that he put his hands on the other parent once, and his sworn denials.
Standard. The excerpt is cut from the video Our Nevada Judges published, with its picture, sound and on-screen labels unaltered, and the full video is linked at the time mark. The on-camera quotation was transcribed from the video and checked a second time by machine; the time mark opens the video where the words begin so the reader can hear them. Each answer from the record is a quotation from a filed document, cited to the page. Nothing is characterized; where the two are set side by side, the reader draws the conclusion.